Remoteness Area comparisons

Jump to interactive chart.

Notes

  • This section reflects the number and proportion of health check patients who received a follow-‍up service in the 12 months following their health check, by the year that their health check was delivered.
  • Some people who have health checks will not need follow-up services. If it were possible, excluding those individuals from the denominator could potentially increase the percentages markedly and reveal different variation.

  • Some records from a small number of service providers have been excluded due to data quality concerns.

Geographic information

This analysis is based on the postcode of the patient’s given mailing address. As a result, the data may not always reflect where the person actually lived – particularly for people who use PO boxes. This is likely to impact some areas more than others and will also have a generally greater impact on the accuracy of smaller geographic areas and more remote areas.

Latest data

Among health check patients in 2022:

  • Major cities had a follow-‍up percentage of 46% (37,000 patients with a follow-‍up).
  • Inner regional areas had a follow-‍up percentage of 44% (25,200 patients).
  • Outer regional areas had the lowest follow-‍up percentage, at 43% (23,900 patients).
  • Remote areas had a follow-‍up percentage of 49% (7,600 patients).
  • Very remote areas had a follow-‍up percentage of 49% (10,000 patients).

Among health check patients from 2018 to 2022:

  • The follow-up percentages in Remote and Very remote areas have reduced in recent years since they peaked in 2019 (both at 49% in 2022, down from 53% and 55%, respectively).
  • Patients in other remoteness areas had relatively stable follow-up patterns.

Figure 19: Use of follow-‍up services among health check patients, by Remoteness Area, by year of health check, 2018 to 2022

A set of 2 interactive charts. Refer to table FS06 in data tables. A long description is available below.