Principles on the use of direct age-standardisation in administrative data collections: for measuring the gap between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians
Citation
AIHW
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2011) Principles on the use of direct age-standardisation in administrative data collections: for measuring the gap between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians, AIHW, Australian Government, accessed 08 November 2024.
APA
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2011). Principles on the use of direct age-standardisation in administrative data collections: for measuring the gap between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians. Canberra: AIHW.
MLA
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Principles on the use of direct age-standardisation in administrative data collections: for measuring the gap between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians. AIHW, 2011.
Vancouver
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Principles on the use of direct age-standardisation in administrative data collections: for measuring the gap between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians. Canberra: AIHW; 2011.
Harvard
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare 2011, Principles on the use of direct age-standardisation in administrative data collections: for measuring the gap between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians, AIHW, Canberra.
PDF | 1010kB
This report recommends that the direct method of age-standardisation be used for purposes of comparing health and welfare outcome measures (e.g. mortality rates, life expectancy, hospital separation rates, disease incidence rates etc.) of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander population and non-Indigenous Australians. The report provides consistency and guidance on when and how to use the direct age-standardisation method and under what circumstances it should not be used.
- ISBN: 978-1-74249-214-8
- Cat. no: CSI 12
- Pages: 25