Table of contents
- Preliminary material
- Title page and verso
- Contents
- List of tables (Part A)
- List of figures (Part A)
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Summary of findings
- Part A Main report
- Sections
- Introduction
- 1.1 Retirement living versus assisted living housing
- 1.2 Evaluation aims and methods
- 1.3 Format of the evaluation report
- Project and participant profiles
- 2.1 Project overviews
- 2.2 RVCP service expenditure profile
- 2.3 Care recipient profiles
- 2.4 Carer profiles
- 2.5 Summary
- A comparison of RVCP with mainstream care packages
- 3.1 Novel features of RVCP packages
- 3.2 A comparison of service delivery in RVCP, CACP and EACH
- 3.3 Principal findings
- Impact of RVCP services on need for residential aged care
- 4.1 Introduction
- 4.2 Addressing ADL support needs
- 4.3 Accommodation outcomes
- 4.4 Consumer feedback
- 4.5 Other considerations
- 4.6 Principal findings
- Sharing the cost of care
- 5.1 Main sources of project income
- 5.2 Income and expenditure
- 5.3 Principal findings
- Conclusion
- 6.1 Key issues
- 6.2 Pilot strengths and weaknesses
- Introduction
- Part B Project reports
- Sections
- HN McLean Memorial Retirement Village
- Australian Unity Retirement Living Services
- Morshead Home for Veterans and Aged Persons
- Forest Place Retirement Village
- Southern Cross Care (Victoria)
- Kingston City Council
- ECH Incorporated
- Resthaven Incorporated
- Mandurah Retirement Village
- Aged Care Services Australia
- End matter
- Appendix tables for Part A
- Appendix tables for Part B
- Appendix 1 Assessment tools
- Appendix 2 Care Experience Survey results
- References